Upset with the Legault administration, medical specialists have declared their intention to implement new pressure strategies from the upcoming week onwards.
Dr. Vincent Oliva, the head of the Fédération des médecins spécialistes du Québec (FMSQ), emphasized the necessity of these actions, stating, “Disruptions may occur, but it is crucial to make our voices heard.”
Beginning next Monday, specialists will boycott medical-administrative meetings related to care organization. They had previously halted their participation in discussions on the Digital Health Record (DSN) earlier in the summer.
Moreover, they will cease teaching undergraduate medical students, although they will continue mentoring residents “for now.”
Anticipating potential backlash, Dr. Oliva acknowledged, “University stakeholders may express discontent, citing potential impacts on student graduations. If students face delays in graduating, internship schedules may need to be restructured.”
Amid speculations about escalating pressure maneuvers, including organizing protests or rallies, Dr. Oliva hinted, “We are contemplating various options.”
This development unfolds against the backdrop of the Legault government’s persistence with Bill 106, which seeks to tie a portion of physicians’ compensation to performance metrics.
Dr. Oliva stressed the prerequisite for necessary resources to attain the desired healthcare outcomes. He advocated for increased access to operating rooms and emphasized the doctors’ commitment to patient care, rebutting claims of laziness.
The ongoing negotiations involving Bill 106, entwined with the expiration of the framework agreement with physicians, are critical. The FMSQ’s representation by former Premier Lucien Bouchard adds another layer to the negotiations.
In response, the government recently augmented its offer to specialists by $72.4 million, accompanied by detailed performance benchmarks with defined timelines.
Health Minister Christian Dubé condemned the pressure tactics, expressing concern for students and patients. He underscored the importance of dialogue at the negotiation table to address the issues constructively.
The Collège des médecins echoed similar apprehensions, emphasizing the need for negotiation and monitoring the situation closely for its impact on patient care.