In early December, Indigenous leaders from various First Nations across Canada, including representatives from Quebec, gathered in Ottawa to meet with Prime Minister Mark Carney.
During the assembly, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) unanimously passed a resolution urging Ottawa to back out of a proposed pipeline deal with Alberta that could potentially lead to the construction of a pipeline to the British Columbia coast.
CityNews interviewed Kahnawà:ke Grand Chief Cody Diabo, who attended the event, to dissect the outcomes of the meeting and explain why many Indigenous leaders are against the proposed pipeline project.
The unanimous decision to oppose the pipeline deal sends a strong message. What message do the First Nations aim to convey to Ottawa through this action?
Kahnawà:ke does not partake in AFN’s voting processes, as the AFN does not represent us. However, we stand in solidarity with our fellow Indigenous communities across Turtle Island in their decisions. This collective rejection of the pipeline deal is significant and highlights the ownership of these lands by the First Nations. Much of Canada comprises unceded Indigenous territories or areas governed by treaties.
The core relationship should exist between the First Nations and the Crown, representing the British monarch. Although the federal government was entrusted to manage this association, it has gradually shifted responsibilities to the provinces. This shift has led to varying degrees of strained relationships between the Indigenous communities and provincial governments. A majority of these relationships continue to face challenges, emphasizing the necessity for engagements with the federal government or the Crown instead of provincial bodies, ultimately reducing conflicts.
Why is early consultation crucial for First Nations in projects like this?
The essence of the original agreements and treaties was to progress collectively. The Kaswenta, or Two Row Wampum philosophy, emphasized coexistence without interference. However, colonial governments persistently overstep boundaries, impacting Indigenous communities. Involving First Nations from the project’s inception, allowing joint decision-making, is imperative. The prevalent approach of disregarding concerns and proceeding with projects regardless wastes everyone’s time.
In our region, we are handling two major projects. We fostered a close relationship with Contra Corp. over nearly a decade before federal intervention. The significance lies in acknowledging the efforts made by the Indigenous communities in establishing successful partnerships. Moreover, the conduct of meetings, such as the AFN gathering, must ensure equitable sharing of perspectives rather than unequal allocations of speaking time, promoting stronger relationships and prioritizing Indigenous voices.
