In their final French-language debate, the five main party leaders in Quebec clashed on key issues such as independence, health care, and immigration. The question of Quebec’s future within Canada took centre stage, just 12 days before the upcoming Oct. 5 election.
During the debate, leaders were prompted to envision Quebec’s status 30 years ahead, pondering whether it would remain part of Canada or become an independent nation. Parti Québécois Leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon argued that independence is the logical path for Quebec, citing its unique position in North America.
However, Quebec Liberal Leader Charles Milliard criticized the push for another referendum, emphasizing that a majority of Quebecers do not support the idea. Conservative Leader Éric Duhaime echoed this sentiment, stating that now is not the time for a referendum.
Meanwhile, Québec solidaire co-leader Ruba Ghazal defended independence as a democratic choice, while CAQ Leader Christine Fréchette emphasized Quebec’s potential to progress within Canada.
Apart from the independence issue, the leaders also debated on health care and immigration, with the CAQ facing criticism from other parties regarding its healthcare policies.
The debate marked a shift in how the referendum question was addressed, according to political analyst Daniel Tran, who noted that the issue was not portrayed as a fear tactic this time.
The discussion around sovereignty sparked mixed reactions among Montrealers, with some expressing concerns about the idea of separation, while others highlighted Quebec’s distinct cultural identity within Canada.
As the campaign enters its final phase, the question remains whether the debate influenced voters’ decisions. While some, like Puok, are still undecided and plan to conduct further research, others, like Clarkson, have already made their choice based on broader issues facing Quebec.
With the election day approaching, all five leaders are gearing up for the final stretch, aiming to make a lasting impression on voters.
